You are reading a single comment by @M_V and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • That doesn't seem like a convincing argument.

    It's not you he has to convince :)

    While the Swiss study was technically doping (900μg in a 12h period, compared with the WADA limit of 800μg), it showed two things which are relevant, first a high of over 3000ng/ml in urine, and second the extreme sensitivity of urinary concentration to time. Taken together, they make determining the total dose taken from a single urine test look more like a coin toss than actual science.

  • Given what you say about time, are A and B samples gathered at the same time or is there a time gap?

About

Avatar for M_V @M_V started