You are reading a single comment by @gbj_tester and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
If he goes through this process of trying to replicate under lab conditions, is any number over 1000 good enough, or does he need to replicate the exact results from the test?
I expect he will bring expert witness testimony in the field of pharmacokinetics to explain that 1200ng/ml in lab conditions is essentially the same as 2000ng/ml on race day, given the natural variability of physiological processes. It will be for the jury to decide whether they believe that. At the very least, he can add to the already existing evidence that 1000ng/ml can be exceeded by using permitted doses, and throw further doubt over the validity of the threshold.
gbj_tester
GoatandTricycle
If he goes through this process of trying to replicate under lab conditions, is any number over 1000 good enough, or does he need to replicate the exact results from the test?
On a separate note, I enjoyed Cath Wiggins contribution. Tony Martin’s take (despite being wrong on the facts) also suggests that Froome isn’t too well liked in the peloton.