You are reading a single comment by @Oliver Schick and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Philippa York on this:

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/dec/14/chris-froome-team-sky-drug-test

    It wasn’t like now when you read that high percentages of elite cyclists have exercise-induced asthma. Although I’m not medically trained, I’d suggest there might be an explication for this.

    When you make a massive effort your lungs often tighten up so you would often be coughing at the back end of a race. I thought it was a normal reaction of the body to limit the damage being done, maybe even a weakness which emerged after time. Apparently it’s neither nowadays.

    So exercise-induced asthma was probably widespread, but once the medical staff realised that riders could be treated for it now they will tell a rider who suffers that you can manage those symptoms and there isn’t the decrease in performance there would be before. It’s maybe not quite performance enhancement, but it certainly removes a restriction or decrease that otherwise may have occurred. A grey area indeed.

    I enjoyed the 'explication' bit, possibly a result of speaking a lot of French? :)

  • It’s maybe not quite performance enhancement, but it certainly removes a restriction or decrease that otherwise may have occurred. A grey area indeed.

    Definitely a grey area in terms of sporting ethics, but then so are all TUEs, whether individual or the global one for salbutamol. On the other hand, the regulation turns it into a hard black and white boundary. As long as the regulation is what it is, you'd have to be a particularly aggressive Corinthian to refuse treatment on ethical grounds.

About