Ulissi admitted he was negligent and took more than the specified dose, hence the (reduced) ban.
Froome is claiming he kept within the dosage limits, so wasn’t negligent.
So why did Ulissi go to the lab in Switzerland to try recreate the sample anonomly?
I'm also confused as to how this makes Froome's position any better?
@GoatandTricycle started
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
Ulissi admitted he was negligent and took more than the specified dose, hence the (reduced) ban.
Froome is claiming he kept within the dosage limits, so wasn’t negligent.