You are reading a single comment by @GoatandTricycle and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Ulissi admitted he was negligent and took more than the specified dose, hence the (reduced) ban.

    Froome is claiming he kept within the dosage limits, so wasn’t negligent.

  • So why did Ulissi go to the lab in Switzerland to try recreate the sample anonomly?

    I'm also confused as to how this makes Froome's position any better?

About