-
I'm guessing they'll try to remove freedom of movement
At which point they'd no longer be in regulatory alignment though?
I guess we'll see. It does sound like one of the first things that they'll try to get rid of.
Without which, they'd be placing firms at a significant competitive disadvantage by not being allowed to recruit from around Europe, whilst still not being able to take advantage of less strict regs as they're in 'alignment'
christianSpaceman-
https://www.lfgss.com/comments/13991347/
What if Davis has been working out on what that number might be?
Obviously they'd need to keep that pretty close to their chests.... -
At which point they'd no longer be in regulatory alignment though?
I guess we'll see. It does sound like one of the first things that they'll try to get rid of.
Without which, they'd be placing firms at a significant competitive disadvantage by not being allowed to recruit from around Europe, whilst still not being able to take advantage of less strict regs as they're in 'alignment'
This has never, ever been about logic - look at what Dov posted as his reasons for voting leave for a snapshot.
GoatandTricycle
Dammit
I'm guessing they'll try to remove freedom of movement or heavily restrict a quota might be a compromise.
I'm not too sure here but maybe we could be used as a stepping stone to trading with the EU for others outside the EU. Could benefit both parties then?