I don't know if it's that resources are stretched because of new hardware releases, having to come up with a new OS update/features each year for both platforms, morale or QA issues or all of the above but I do think it would make more sense to just abandon the current OS point release cycles and move to a rolling release model for everything.
It's almost certainly been thought about but I imagine the marketing department are pretty adamant about having a catchy new name each year, like they did with calling a fucking processor "Bionic".
It just seems like they need to slow things down a bit and not give themselves arbitrary deadlines for the sake of the press cycle.
I don't know if it's that resources are stretched because of new hardware releases, having to come up with a new OS update/features each year for both platforms, morale or QA issues or all of the above but I do think it would make more sense to just abandon the current OS point release cycles and move to a rolling release model for everything.
It's almost certainly been thought about but I imagine the marketing department are pretty adamant about having a catchy new name each year, like they did with calling a fucking processor "Bionic".
It just seems like they need to slow things down a bit and not give themselves arbitrary deadlines for the sake of the press cycle.