He began as an outsider, promising a proletariat-based solution using traditional components overlooked by "the petty and haute bourgeoisie" who said it would never work, or that he should simply integrate current capitalist modes of production or "Ultegra Di2" which would only further condense the post-colonial powers' grip on his property and the wider popular imagination.
Then he rode to infamy in an manner that none of us -- least of all him -- expected. But his words and actions had impact. He had this traditional frame, which he then modified employing some of the greatest working hands in industry which actualised his beliefs in the true rise of voice the Working Class. But he was wildly misunderstood, and his stance was never that it was to be held as structure for mass movement, but rather as a symbol of how to remove power from those who control the means of production.
So he returned back to the masses to show them with searing irony the futility and painful cycle of late-stage capitalism or "hydraulic" by giving the populace what it craved; a litany of disc brakes operating as a effectively a mirror to itself with DBAD as a maintained reflection of how we drug ourselves into submission (or "Brevet Windblock" ourselves). Now that DBAD serves not only as a symbol but also a reality on which the future can be ridden, a chorus of voices choose to impede DBAD's call to the Left for individual workers to reject capitalist modes of subservience, while @amey encourages them to "braze-on".
This thread is a perfect exposé of Amey's fundamental Radical Leftism.
He began as an outsider, promising a proletariat-based solution using traditional components overlooked by "the petty and haute bourgeoisie" who said it would never work, or that he should simply integrate current capitalist modes of production or "Ultegra Di2" which would only further condense the post-colonial powers' grip on his property and the wider popular imagination.
Then he rode to infamy in an manner that none of us -- least of all him -- expected. But his words and actions had impact. He had this traditional frame, which he then modified employing some of the greatest working hands in industry which actualised his beliefs in the true rise of voice the Working Class. But he was wildly misunderstood, and his stance was never that it was to be held as structure for mass movement, but rather as a symbol of how to remove power from those who control the means of production.
So he returned back to the masses to show them with searing irony the futility and painful cycle of late-stage capitalism or "hydraulic" by giving the populace what it craved; a litany of disc brakes operating as a effectively a mirror to itself with DBAD as a maintained reflection of how we drug ourselves into submission (or "Brevet Windblock" ourselves). Now that DBAD serves not only as a symbol but also a reality on which the future can be ridden, a chorus of voices choose to impede DBAD's call to the Left for individual workers to reject capitalist modes of subservience, while @amey encourages them to "braze-on".