You are reading a single comment by @Sam_w and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Survey question.

    Chap I work with who is an engineer and used to work in residential sector is saying that I would be better off getting specialists in than doing a full structural. Reason being that the full structural is limited and often the report is wishy washy and full of recommendations to get specialists in to investigate anyway.

    So I' debating getting

    1. Drainage survey with cctv done.
    2. Timber and damp survey. This should indirectly find any issues with the roof and chimney.

    And then structurally I can check for subsidence by just doing a walk around looking for cracks myself.

    Between those 3, I think I'm covering all the important stuff, and I'm going to get a more thorough survey than an all in one jobbie.

    Am I mad?

  • Structural is difficult beyond visual without being invasive, i.e. removing render\plaster and digging trial pits, hence why surveyors cover themselves for that eventuality.

    Some of our walls that looked the worst were actually fine, and others which looked fine with render and plaster on were screwed on the inside...

About

Avatar for Sam_w @Sam_w started