You are reading a single comment by @ReekBlefs and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
@ReekBlefs
Here's a weird one. Leasehold law, not been able to find a clear answer.
We know where the freeholder owns the land, they have to pay upkeep and they can do what they want with it.
We also know where the land is considered to be common land, the residents have to pay upkeep via the service charge.
My flat has a single space where the land is a combination of demised common, and nondemised land - no physical boundary. Currently we're getting the worst of both worlds - freeholder thinks he can do what he wants with it, but residents have to pay upkeep - but I'm just wondering if there's any precedent in law which determines who has priority if anyone?