-
Hang on, they tested positive for nandralone but claim they had high T because they ate wild boar? The UKAD claim isn't that they tested for high T, it's for nandralone so how is their claim even a defence?
hippy-
I know, bit weird. It seems like there has been lots of back and forth on the legal front.
Seemed at one point like Fury's legal team were doing it to put pressure on UKAD to end it.
Now I'm not so sure.@Hamham he retired supposedly after the two postponements... which were due to the suspension. What I don't get is how did he manage to fight Klitschko after testing positive.
The timelines I have read are very confusing. Surely Klitschko has a potential lawsuit in waiting.Whats safe to say is the whole thing is a massive mess!! UKAD are obviously not 100% sure of their case based on this report. Unless it's just a pragmatic approach or to secure more funding, in light of the doping mess sport is in.
GoatandTricycle
So this long and winding story takes another turn, http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/41899478
My mind has changed so much over the course of this investigation I no longer no what to think!