-
no one in any of the comments referred to in any of the articles or links you have posted, has questioned whether or not the Holocaust happened.
I know, my point is it's also wrong to suggest that the holocaust could be open to questioning. When you know a subject is that sensitive, why nudge at it?
needs better evidence than shown so far.
Fair enough, happy to cordially disagree with you.
-
I know, my point is it's also wrong to suggest that the holocaust could be open to questioning
That’s not what Loach said though. He said it is healthy to debate everything in history.
There are people who deny the Holocaust. They need to be engaged with to debate the point to try to make them change their mind.
Else what? Ignore them?
Again, no one in any of the comments referred to in any of the articles or links you have posted, has questioned whether or not the Holocaust happened. Though the BBC reporter in the Loach story repeats that misrepresentation. You might also call that 'insidious'.
To say that Labour, rather than a few of its members and rather than the society from which its members, and the members of all political parties, are drawn, has a problem with anti-semitism, needs better evidence than shown so far.