You are reading a single comment by @Scrabble and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/rules-for-cyclists-59-to-82
"
Rule 59Clothing. You should wear
a cycle helmet which conforms to current regulations, is the correct size and securely fastened appropriate clothes for cycling. Avoid clothes which may get tangled in the chain, or in a wheel or may obscure your lights light-coloured or fluorescent clothing which helps other road users to see you in daylight and poor light reflective clothing and/or accessories (belt, arm or ankle bands) in the dark.
"
Of course, "should" means it is not a legal requirement, only advisory.
-
Highway code rule 59:
Clothing. You should wear
- a cycle helmet which conforms to current regulations, is the correct size and securely fastened
- appropriate clothes for cycling. Avoid clothes which may get tangled in the chain, or in a wheel or may obscure your lights
- light-coloured or fluorescent clothing which helps other road users to see you in daylight and poor light
- reflective clothing and/or accessories (belt, arm or ankle bands) in the dark.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/rules-for-cyclists-59-to-82
- a cycle helmet which conforms to current regulations, is the correct size and securely fastened
Are letters about road safety sent out to LAs regularly or is this a special case?
Hard to disagree with the content, but it smacks of yet more persecution.
I guess the LAs are unlikely to do much anyway - just put it on the growing pile of unaffordable directives to ignore.