You are reading a single comment by @Stonehedge and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Mentioned but judge makes it clear that it is irrelevant to the case at hand.
I.e you have to be prepared for somebody to do something unexpected when driving a vehicle.
It kind of reminds me of that poor sod who died on London Bridge a few years ago. He was incredibly drunk, lost control of his bike, hit the central reservation and went flying into the path of an oncoming car. Driver of car was jailed for causing the accident by speeding and the inebriation of the cyclist was irrelevant...he would have stopped in time if he wasn't speeding.
Stonehedge
HousecatHST
CanonAxe
Forgive me skim read the judge's report but was there any mention that the victim of the CA case, was partially responsible for the incident for crossing where she did or was it not mentioned?