Talking of trolling, I fear that stating this appears as just that. But it's not, it's a genuine question:
Why is the husband of the 'selfie cyclist' arguing that if she wore a helmet she would still be alive, rather than arguing the dangers of messing about on your phone while operating a vehicle of any kind?
I would have thought that falling and dying seems a pretty clear cut argument against being distracted by taking selfies on a bike, regardless of whether a helmet might have reduced risk of death.
Talking of trolling, I fear that stating this appears as just that. But it's not, it's a genuine question:
Why is the husband of the 'selfie cyclist' arguing that if she wore a helmet she would still be alive, rather than arguing the dangers of messing about on your phone while operating a vehicle of any kind?
I would have thought that falling and dying seems a pretty clear cut argument against being distracted by taking selfies on a bike, regardless of whether a helmet might have reduced risk of death.