You are reading a single comment by @hamrack and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Yeah, I took shell to exclude tension structures, rather thinking along the lines of concrete shells.

    Yeah, classic numberphile video; where does it address whether saddles are better than domes, all I thought it said was that the Gaussian curvature of anticlastics are negative and synclastics are positive?

    For some reason had it in my head that saddles where intrinsically more efficient a (concrete shell) structure than domes. Must be mistaken.

  • Shit, one should really rewatch a video before linking to it. I was trying to get at the inability to move between -ve and +ve (total) curvature. Intuitively (ie guessing) a loading a domestic won't try to change the sign of the curvature, whereas loading a saddle will...?

  • Intuitively (ie guessing) a loading a domestic won't try to change the sign of the curvature, whereas loading a saddle will...?

    I'll take your word for it. I always find it tricky to think of saddles.

About

Avatar for hamrack @hamrack started