In the news

The "hidden message" in Blair not getting a knighthood is that the Queen is a 80+ year old woman and about as far to the right as you can expect. Same reason that neither of the two living labour prime ministers got invited to the recent royal wedding; the royal family is as Tory as you get.

Wilders is also costing the Dutch tax payers a lot for security, it's a cost society has to bear as some people use violence instead of words :/

Such high costs for make up though...really?

You've obviously forgotten Sir Harrold Wilson then - lol

@dst It's TOTALLY his decision to use upto £3M/yr. No other ex-PM has ever come close to his £30M binge at your expense.

b) how we see. Our eyes designed to max out at our max speed (c. 20mph). After that point we start taking snapshots and our brain fills in the gaps based on assumptions.

Do you have source for this? Am skeptical but happy to be corrected.

I think the reason Harold Wilson didn't make it to Kate's wedding was on account of his being dead, rather than his political viewpoint.

Also, Wilson got a lifetime peerage, whereas the Thatcher's got a hereditary peerage, meaning good ol' boy Mark Thatcher is now a peer. I suppose he's a good man to have around if you need somebody to clarify some points on international arms smuggling.

‘There was a massive bottleneck at the front door and by the time I regained consciousness I noticed that all of the boxes had been picked up the guy who owns the local off licence and his 36 grown-up children.’

It's funny, but SENN is a spoof site.

The other issue is that drivers commonly stop and wave someone through, not considering that there is a lane next to them with bikes/motorbikes.

The driver then turning right doesn't bother looking properly as someone has told them it is safe to go.

Reference? He probably needs more security as hsle is so disliked

Honestly, I think that the cost of diplomatic protection for a former PM is not an issue in any way regardless of how much it is.

Could be another pay-day looming for Trump?

https://lawnewz.com/high-profile/report-trump-took-17-million-from-insurance-for-hurricane-damage-that-might-not-exist/

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/christian-home-destroyed-flood-tony-perkins-natural-disasters-gods-punishment-homosexuality-a7196786.html?cmpid=facebook-post

"During a broadcast on the group’s radio station, he told how he and his family had fled in a canoe bloody gret ark what heterogod done tole me to build."

More details released. V.sad.

https://mobile.twitter.com/gmpolice/status/902238304715845632/photo/1

If I dont wear lycra, people won't know how much weight I have to lose.

Admittedly they don't see it when I'm driving my punto.
But they do see it when I get out to buy my Reece's peanut butter cups in Tesco.

Also, agreed, Hoy can go fuck himself up his fat ass.

Buffalo Bill chimes in on CfinA
https://buffalobillbikeblog.wordpress.com/2017/08/28/why-we-are-responsible-for-charlie-alliston/amp/

.

and your fucking point is?

That Buffalo Bill wrote something about Charlie Alliston.

Bill has been around for ages, campaigning for couriers and cyclists. He has a measured and informed point of view. His opinions tend to carry weight and depth.

@Buffalo_Bill - PM him, i'm sure he'd love to hear your thoughts.

That Buffalo Bill wrote something about Charlie Alliston.

Ok Cartman, I get that you get it.

But this is sub judice and it might affect justice?

I dont much care about charlie, but I think you should just stfu just like I think Bill should stfu.
Just for a while anyway.

Eh? Are you contacting all the press about this? People can discuss current court cases.

The jury has decided. It's with the judge now, and I doubt she's on Lufguss on a bank holiday night poring through our posts to help her decide what sentence to give him.

But but but righteous (ignorant) indignation.

It's with the judge now

sub judice like i said