You are reading a single comment by @.mo. and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
'Negligible action' (think you mean 'negligence') had fuck all to do with the manslaughter charge - unlawful act manslaughter is a different thing to gross negligence manslaughter.
-
Serial tho, for the 'pro no brakes' guys. Why, not?
Whats the reason for no brake on the bike, honestly.
Why are you even asking?
Do you want to be convinced?
Do you want someone else to be convinced?Or do you just want to tell someone how stupid they are and how you're the better person because you obey the law?
Edit: that reads quite aggressively, sorry. I just don't see much value in having that discussion, now or ever.
h2o
M_V
@.mo.
/\
Reads a lot like the Guardian article....
Serial tho, for the 'pro no brakes' guys. Why, not?
Whats the reason for no brake on the bike, honestly.
The law says its a no-no, common sense, general consensus, countless threads and even court cases say so.
So theres gotta be a better reason then 'dont wnt 1' lol
It dint used to be a big deal really but, well, now look what you've all gone and caused!!
Asking for a friend.
In regards to Charlie he has been kinda lucky.
The Judge sounds intelligent and fair.
The charge of Manslaughter is dropped because there is no solid case for negligible action.
There is no case for negligible action because you cannot prove whether someone knows something or not, in respect to the defence.
The Judge urged the Jury to take care with deliberation, reminding the Jury of the defendants age and the rarity of the accident.
The Judge is considering a jail term in response to the defendants actions surrounding the case and his demeanor in court.
Laws are gonna be changing and theres deff gonna be some aggro.
I've noticed cars n shit getting closer in past few weeks, Ive got a road bike and don't usually have problems.
Maybe I'm doing it.
I dunno.