You are reading a single comment by @stevo_com and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Yes, I think you (or someone else) may have mentioned that before. It's actually quite restricted to cases in which a crash has occurred and the police saw it; it is that curious kind of after-the-fact charge that is probably the start of a slippery slope towards blaming pedestrians or introducing 'jaywalking' legislation. Nonetheless, as things stand even in NI pedestrians currently have the right to cross anywhere, irrespective of how blame may be assigned afterwards.

  • I was being flippant. Yes, the whole point of it being discretionary is to allow attribution of blame to a pedestrian in the event of an "accident". It's not like if you walk out into a clear road you'll get your collar felt. Considering most people in NI live in areas with no pavement/sidewalk/footpath.

    But, it's hardly one of NI's most ridiculous laws........

  • It does make you wonder how it came about. Perhaps there was a particular case that prompted it and it sailed under the radar.

  • most people in NI live in areas with no pavement/sidewalk/footpath/electricity/indoor toilets/hope/opposable thumbs

    Plenty flegs tho.

About

Avatar for stevo_com @stevo_com started