-
• #452
Interesting development. Be interesting to see how it ends.
-
• #453
I know that I have to have a full on mot every 5 years after the age of 45... Maybe that?
-
• #454
I would support mandatory re-tests every 10 years for class B licenses, every 5 years for B+E, C and D, and class B every 5 years for drivers aged 60+. An recently-issued eye-test report should be a pre-requisite for re-tests.
-
• #455
I'd like it to be a bit more often than that for professional drivers actually. A full on driving test each time might be a bit excessive, but some kind of regular "human MOT" would be good.
In particular I am thinking of that bin lorry driver in Glasgow who "blacked out" behind the wheel. -
• #456
As for the 77 year old bus driver... I am currently working with a 63 year old who I swear just disconnects sometimes. Just brief moments with a completely vacant stare, and I suspect that those moments more or less resets her entire brain. Luckily we only have white collar office jobs so there isn't any significant harm, but I worry as she occasionally drives to work.
-
• #457
that case was a fucking disgrace. The procurator fiscal made the inexplicable decision not to prosecute the driver-opening up speculation that if he'd been found guilty the Council would have themselves been open to negligence charges for failing to check his background record before employing him. The civil case then failed, and the cunt was seen driving uninsured and unlicensed to the shops and back...
-
• #458
Any idea what he's up to now? If I had caused the death of 6 innocent people, whatever the circumstances, I would seriously consider offing myself.
-
• #459
well he's gotten back behind the wheel again despite the risk of further blackouts/killing more people so I'd say he's not too remorseful about it, apart from that I really don't know. Wouldn't surprise me if he just lied again to get another job but hopefully he's so notorious nobody will touch him.
-
• #462
A newer article, this one says six injured, not nine:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/aug/10/bus-crashes-shop-south-london-clapham-injured
I think the driver would have been most at risk, along with any passengers in the front row at the top, but it seems the bus mainly hit on its left side. Still, anyone sitting on the left side in the front row at the top could have come off very badly, I hope that's not the case.
-
• #463
They had to cut the top passenger out I think:
-
• #464
That could be--two passengers according to this:
"Two female passengers are trapped on the top deck of the bus, crews are working to free them.
"The passengers are both conscious and breathing."
-
• #465
That's worrying, you can see where the yellow bar at the front(usually by the window) and the little hole the driver can look up into are folded all the way in.
So lucky no pedestrians got caught between, that pavement is usually very busy with people walking to/from clapham junction.
-
• #466
Various guardian angels seem to have been at work here:
-
• #467
That's truly incredible! 7 storeys!
Presumably an airbag saved this ladies life. -
• #468
More 'building crashing into cars'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-40986193
-
• #469
I wonder why would the vehicles be left dangling if it was just the facade that had come loose?!
-
• #470
I think it was not only the low wall around the deck but also part of the deck that came loose.
-
• #471
Ah, yes. There's good 4 foot of floor gone as well.
-
• #472
A bad one:
No mention at all of what happened to the driver, but I suspect they must have got out unscathed. As seems evident from incidents linked to in this thread, it's very unusual for a crash like this to cause such a bad fire.
-
• #473
The poor bloke snoozing on his sofa must've got the shock of his life when this self driving car (I assume it's self driving as the car crashed into the building without human intervention) smashed into his house;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-41140279
-
• #474
Fucking thing started a fire too
-
• #475
Well, there is mention of a driver:
A man in his 20s, believed to be the driver, has been arrested.
There is the odd article that doesn't mention any human agency at all, though.
I'd guess there was probably some unfitness (is that a word?) to drive which the employers should have been aware of, I wonder if there are more stringent rules on testing (by the company) over-65s or something or documents that needed to be in place.