After the closing arguments the judge will give a summing up explaining the law involved, summarising the prosecution and defence, and direct the jury as to what questions must be answered to establish if the prosecution has proven its case. So my expectation is that the judge will direct the jury to consider those four points, and to make a decision on each point that is disputed by the defence (so probably not point 1 about brakelessness being illegal).
Caveat - I never practiced, just did the degree, so a practicing barrister would know much better than I.
Cheers, that seems like a fair procedure to me. I think there's a lot of interesting questions to be asked about this case that are probably best left until after a verdict is delivered.
After the closing arguments the judge will give a summing up explaining the law involved, summarising the prosecution and defence, and direct the jury as to what questions must be answered to establish if the prosecution has proven its case. So my expectation is that the judge will direct the jury to consider those four points, and to make a decision on each point that is disputed by the defence (so probably not point 1 about brakelessness being illegal).
Caveat - I never practiced, just did the degree, so a practicing barrister would know much better than I.