-
Thanks. Justice system isn't my thing. That just looks wrong next to an 1861 charge that an 18 year old might reasonably think means cycling like a dumpling. Sorry, Driving. Are we really divers of bikes not cyclists in law?
I think the not wanting to self harm thing is still valid, helmet. We all have to be responsible for our own actions and stepping out in to busy road without giving it enough respect is reckless.
This is wrong in law. The prosecution only needs to satisfy the jury that he was reckless as to any injury resulting from his actions, not that he was reckless as to whether anyone could be killed.