-
• #127
I'm 6'3 and got a 58, which is great. I could have gotten away with a 56 though I think, but I am all arms and torso.
-
• #128
I'm 6ft and got a 56.
No regrets. Lots of seatpost showing, relatively upright riding position (7 deg. riser stem just cuz I already had it).
Reckon 58 would be great too so go figure. Big bikes look better:) -
• #129
Great looking bike. Thanks for your replies.
-
• #130
I'm 6'3 and got a 58, which is great.
im 6'2" and got a 60cm, would like to view your setup.
-
• #131
It's here: https://www.lfgss.com/comments/13689675/
-
• #132
It's here: https://www.lfgss.com/comments/13689675/
that's strange. i'm shorter than you with apparently longer legs but the cock pit is quite similar except mine is higher.
are you riding in a really upright position by any chance?
-
• #133
Much more upright than my slammed carbon fast rig! This is my all day/off road/commuter/Swiss army bike so it's setup to reflect that. It's really comfortable and if I do need/want to go a bit quicker I can ride in the drops for hours without any discomfort
-
• #134
sure, the wolverine is supposed to be enjoyed long and comfortably.
-
• #135
Found this example of a 66cm Wolverine. Looking at the geo chart, it'd fit me really well.
Edit - I'm 6' 7"
-
• #136
Just to throw (another) spanner in the works, I'm im 6'2" and ride the 62.
-
• #137
-
• #138
nice offroad unicycle you've got yourself there
-
• #139
It's the only side on pic I had on my computer at the time, haha!
-
• #140
I never understand how I can be 2" taller than you guys ride two sizes smaller
-
• #141
Just to throw (another) spanner in the works, I'm im 6'2" and ride the 62.
i was thinking of the 62cm but wanted a bit more compact setup, hence the 60cm.
although if i chose to use a bar with a back sweep like jones for some reason i'd go for the 66cm.
-
• #142
I'm 6'3 and ride a 60cm
1 Attachment
-
• #143
Leg length I guess..?
What's your saddle height?
-
• #144
Don't think I ever posted my baby here...
-
• #145
Dude, your seatpost is the wrong way around! Literally unridable.
Nice bike. New tyres? How do you like 'em?
-
• #146
That's the unbridled rebel in me. I absolutely (Maxxis) refuse to conform.
Tyres are great - not had too much chance to throw them around on dirt because I'm too busy buying wine, but they roll pretty well on tarmac when tubeless.
-
• #147
Anyone else had problems with their Woverine dropouts? Evan Bacon has been pretty vocal since leaving Soma/Merry Sales (presumably somewhat un-acrimoniously)...
https://www.instagram.com/p/BV5STifl2Xr/
https://www.instagram.com/p/BWq5oaklAsK/ -
• #148
Not yet but I've been following those posts with a little concern. My wolverine right now is nothing more than a glorified commuter / kid carrier, so have been considering something (possibly) more solid, don't want something snapping with a kid on the back
-
• #149
Yes that is slightly disconcerting. I did give mine a bit of a caning off-road when I first got it and I had it set up with flat bars. I haven't run the rear dropouts all the way back at any point, but I would like to think that's not the reason I'm still alive.
-
• #150
Ive seen a few more on instragram, I thought they were just co-incidence, thats every off putting
Compare stack and reach of cannondale and specialized with this
Dale has 577 stack and 399 reach
Specialized has 597 stack and 387 reach
I'd assume Cannondale and Specialized include the integrated headset stack (whatever it may be). Wolverine takes external 1 1/8 which add about 25-30mm to the stack. CK for example is 31.4mm.