I had a long conversation with @coppiThat about this today. You have to go with what you like most although the depreciation of the Tudor and the Omega does rattle me a bit.
The Speedy Mk2 would cost me about £8k but you can buy a 6 month old one for about £5,5k. That's not cool. The Tudor hasn't been sold long enough to know how it will perform price wise. At least when buying a sub you know its not going to ship a few grand in the first year.
The sub is unarguably the most complete watch but the Tudor really appeals to me. I also have a soft spot for a speedy Mk2 but I think I prefer it in steel.
You're buying it to wear, so it doesn't make sense to get too tied down on value. I can be a bit old fashioned in some of my views, so precious metal ≠ sports watch.
Although bi-metal isn't my thing I can get behind an OP no-date:
I have to agree, I think the Tudor looks best.
I had a long conversation with @coppiThat about this today. You have to go with what you like most although the depreciation of the Tudor and the Omega does rattle me a bit.
The Speedy Mk2 would cost me about £8k but you can buy a 6 month old one for about £5,5k. That's not cool. The Tudor hasn't been sold long enough to know how it will perform price wise. At least when buying a sub you know its not going to ship a few grand in the first year.
The sub is unarguably the most complete watch but the Tudor really appeals to me. I also have a soft spot for a speedy Mk2 but I think I prefer it in steel.