You are reading a single comment by @stevo_com and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • They'll care after they lose £100k, or they can't get insurance after losing £100k of a clients cash, but not before.

  • That's the thing, the neighbour of a friend of mrs_com was a victim recently of exactly the method I described (£30k although nothing to do with Glazer Delmar) and neither the bank that hosted the bad actors' account nor the solicitor could give a fuck. I only know as she got wind of what my job is and contacted me.

    Until they can be shown to be negligent through not preventing it, the consumer gets fucked.

  • That's the thing, the neighbour of a friend of mrs_com was a victim recently of exactly the method I described (£30k although nothing to do with Glazer Delmar) and neither the bank that hosted the bad actors' account nor the solicitor could give a fuck. I only know as she got wind of what my job is and contacted me.

    Until they can be shown to be negligent through not preventing it, the consumer gets fucked.

    It's an interesting philosophical question - at what point does it become negligence to not deploy a means of stopping your clients from being defrauded?

  • the bank that hosted the bad actors' account

    Report their lack of giving a shit to the FCA. A multi-million pound fine might make them change their mind.

About

Avatar for stevo_com @stevo_com started