So Twitter following Britain First isn't sufficient to raise an eyebrow from those tasked with protecting us?
I'm not suggesting hiring a van is of itself sufficient, it is Darren Osborne's combination of actions that should have resulted in him being pulled over.
Less flippantly - Britain First isn't a proscribed organisation. So there's not sufficient legal cause to probe into someone's life just because they follow them on twitter.
So Twitter following Britain First isn't sufficient to raise an eyebrow from those tasked with protecting us?
I'm not suggesting hiring a van is of itself sufficient, it is Darren Osborne's combination of actions that should have resulted in him being pulled over.