-
apparently he was fucking about on his iPad looking for an answer. the worthless shit.
you are quick - https://www.lfgss.com/comments/13662110/
-
from the Guardian's rolling coverage:
"Corbyn said:
It is totally and absolutely, completely unacceptable for anyone to
throw abuse at anyone else. Journalists do ask difficult questions and
journalists do do a job that does require asking difficult questions
sometimes in difficult circumstances.If you don’t like what a reporter says or asks me, or anybody else,
understand the question they’re asking. We will all do our best to
answer those questions, but under no circumstances whatsoever should
anyone throw personal abuse at anyone else, because they are doing the
job that they have been employed to do and I will not tolerate it
under any circumstances.He also claimed he did not mind people asking him difficult questions.
There isn’t such a thing as being unfair to politicians. If you put
yourself up for elected office in public life you are subject to
permanent scrutiny.I never get upset by these things. Never be so high and mighty that
you can’t listen to everybody else and make sure that you understand
the motives of the majority of our people and the kind of society that
we want to live in." -
• #1429
Has Theresa May done anything today? Wtf is up with coverage? Osborne has brutally attacked the Tories and the headline of time BBC remains him forgetting a number.
-
Is there any information about how last nights panel of questioners was chosen for Sky's debate...? Or who chose them...? Bit of transparency would be nice, yes the owner of the pharmacy is 'technically' a small business owner, but I'm sure any punter in the street who watched it would not assume that a 'small' business can actually turnover up to £10 million....
If nothing else this election is really opening my eyes to the media biases...
-
Interesting, but I understand it's been retracted.
And the original article from the Manchester evening news
-
• #1434
Craig Murray is a tad... extreme. I don't think character assassination is really appropriate here. But that's some pretty crazy stuff.
-
Nice one
-
• #1439
Why is 35-64 one category?
-
I thought it might be generation x, but the earliest definitions start in the 60's. It looks like maybe they just split the population into:
Really Labour
Quite Labour
Quite Tory
Very Tory -
• #1443
Thinking the same.
-
there are some good reasons against it
-
" ... but under no circumstances whatsoever should anyone throw personal abuse at anyone else, because they are doing the job that they have been employed to do and I will not tolerate it under any circumstances."
I understand Corbs needs to get this as far out of the papers as possible and it's potentially draining for any positive momentum coming from the last week of campaigning, but she's a fucking BBC journalist peddaling a very overt right-wing agenda. Her "job", along with everyone else at the BBC is to ....
to act in the public interest, serving all audiences through the provision of impartial, high-quality and distinctive output and services which inform, educate and entertain.
That's what it says in the Royal Charter for the continuance of the British
Broadcasting Corporation. -
And the original article from the Manchester evening news
If this the British equivalent of Breaking Bad?
not4sale
ough
andyp
Hefty
Dangeruss
HousecatHST
starfish&coffee
Dammit
stevo_com
Sumo
Aroogah
tbc
jimmy_james
laner
🅑🅐🅣🅣
Velocio-
Post a reply
About
General Election June 2017
Posted by
@coppiThat
So much this. There's nothing in the transcript of that interview that looks like a problem (I've not listened) but why aren't the BBC grilling the Tories in the same way?