You are reading a single comment by @stevo_com and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • So the harm it causes is known about and understood, yet it persists in order to preserve a competitive edge?

    No wonder the public at large have no faith in journalists being responsible for policing their own behaviour.

    Ironically it persists because that's what the readers want. But also because getting journos from lots of different outlets to do something is like herding cats. The fact remains that if they don't try to get comment they're not reporting the story properly.

  • Not all readers.

    But seriously, that's not a good enough excuse. Readers (or anybody) have no right to be privy to the feelings or emotions of a grieving family. If they want to give it willingly and come forward, then fine, that is their right. But for anyone other than someone specifically trained to deal with or therapise the feelings of grief to ask someone to speak candidly about how they are feeling, is hugely irresponsible. Who knows what they could be triggering.

    Telling me what the parents of an murdered child or brother of a missing person is feeling does nothing to provide me with more facts or information about the incident.

    Leave the fact collecting to the police.

About

Avatar for stevo_com @stevo_com started