-
Happily people as narrow minded as you are not the majority in cities, but as you are more vocal, it sometimes seems like you are. You take one issue you object to, and thereby judge millions of people you have never met. It entrenches division, it supports the idea that "the left" are elitists who live in cities, and it helps Corbyn to lose voters.
My original point was that hunting in general is a nuanced issue, not that I want to bring back fox hunting.
William.-
Happily people as narrow minded as you are not the majority in cities, but as you are more vocal, it sometimes seems like you are. You take one issue you object to, and thereby judge millions of people you have never met. It entrenches division, it supports the idea that "the left" are elitists who live in cities, and it helps Corbyn to lose voters.
Problem with what you are saying is that he's not wrong. Would you be happier if Corbyn rode to hounds in Islington (plenty of foxes) in defiance of the ban?
Or should he stick to his principles about a subject where he is correct?
Or can you make a compelling case that killing animals for fun be considered a positive thing to do?
-
The issues I object to are people with no prospect of ever paying higher rate income tax voting for the Tories, and people living in areas that are dependent upon EU funds voting Leave.
The 'nuance' is not appreciated by the target recipients of the projectiles.
Dammit
mespilus
Greenhell has offered you some advice.
Strangely laws seem to emanate from conurbations/centres of power, but it could be our soon to be elected all-kipped-up Tory party will revert to feudalism, then you can lobby your local Lord to bring back all the forms of animal torture/baiting.