Well, at the time Trafi was trying to claim it wasn't true.
But the wider point is - imagine if every statement in parliament could be injuncted by a company like that, just because MP wasn't personally able to prove the allegation. It'd be horrible.
Yes, I can see that, of course. Parliament is sovereign, after all. :) I just meant that since it seems very unlikely now that there is much to the HSBC-IGPL story, in this case it misfired--but perhaps that's part of the point for allowing it, or I'm jumping the gun again.
Well, at the time Trafi was trying to claim it wasn't true.
But the wider point is - imagine if every statement in parliament could be injuncted by a company like that, just because MP wasn't personally able to prove the allegation. It'd be horrible.