You are reading a single comment by @MicroDosed™ and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Sucks for those who were clean (based on the evidence I've seen: Edwards; most probably, Radcliffe hmmmm) but seems like quite a sensible approach as some of the records are so far out of reach for obvious reasons. They should also bring in a financial disincentive too, hold onto x% of the athlete's winnings until 10years post retirement or something.

  • He's a committed Christian.

  • None whatsoever, entirely based on the lack of any substantiated rumours etc.

  • The old adage 'you can't prove a negative'. So you can't but there's never been the whispers like there is/was around Coe, Radcliffe and Farah to cause overt suspicion. Also the triple jump is a highly technical discipline rather than just running around in circles....

    That said strength and speed would be enhanced by drug use, have many triple-jumpers tested positive?

About