He refused to stand in court till they read out his title.
Apparently, they first addressed him as 'Mr St David's', which is not his 'Mr' name--it's Philipps, so I think that's fair enough? Or did they try calling him 'Mr Philipps' first, too?
Presumably, you should not identify yourself in court by a name you don't bear?
Needless to say, I've managed to pick out the most insignificant thing to comment on in that case.
Apparently, they first addressed him as 'Mr St David's', which is not his 'Mr' name--it's Philipps, so I think that's fair enough? Or did they try calling him 'Mr Philipps' first, too?
Presumably, you should not identify yourself in court by a name you don't bear?
Needless to say, I've managed to pick out the most insignificant thing to comment on in that case.