I can see the attraction of 'no rights' to poor, (as in unscrupulous), employers, but unskilled workers need some income, and it either comes as wages or benefits from the State. Surely even the most rabid rightwinger must question Amazon & Tesco being subsidised to employ minimum wage earners on zhcs?
I can see the attraction of 'no rights' to poor, (as in unscrupulous), employers, but unskilled workers need some income, and it either comes as wages or benefits from the State. Surely even the most rabid rightwinger must question Amazon & Tesco being subsidised to employ minimum wage earners on zhcs?