You are reading a single comment by @dan and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • do any of these actually work?

    Any links to recent studies would be appreciated.

  • Can't link to studies. But having used various types of masks in labs, cleanrooms, etc (and had a couple fail also), for them to work well, they have to fit properly. I've not seen one person in the wild, so to speak, wearing one of the cycling types without a gaping chasm between their face and the mask, especially when moving around. So of course the majority of the air follows the path of least resistance around the mask. Sadly for me also beards and these things won't get on either for the same reasons.

  • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5289918/

    Background:
    Practical approaches to protect individuals from ambient particulate matter (PM) are urgently needed in developing countries. Evidence on the health benefits of wearing particulate-filtering respirators is limited.

    Objectives:
    We evaluated the short-term cardiovascular health effects of wearing respirators in China.

    Methods:
    A randomized crossover trial was performed in 24 healthy young adults in Shanghai, China in 2014. The subjects were randomized into two groups and wore particulate-filtering respirators for 48 hr alternating with a 3-week washout interval. Heart rate variability (HRV) and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) were continuously monitored during the 2nd 24 hr in each intervention. Circulating biomarkers were measured at the end of each intervention. Linear mixed-effect models were applied to evaluate the effects of wearing respirators on health outcomes.

    Results:
    During the intervention periods, the mean daily average concentration of PM with an aerodynamic diameter < 2.5 μm (PM2.5) was 74.2 μg/m3. Compared with the absence of respirators, wearing respirators was associated with a decrease of 2.7 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1, 5.2 mmHg] in systolic BP and increases of HRV parameters, including 12.5% (95% CI: 3.8%, 21.2%) in high frequency (HF) power, 10.9% (95% CI: 1.8%, 20.0%) in the root mean square of the successive differences, and 22.1% (95% CI: 3.6%, 40.7%) in the percentage of normal RR intervals with duration > 50 msec different from the previous normal RR interval (pNN50). The presence of respirators was also associated with a decrease of 7.8% (95% CI: 3.5%, 12.1%) in the ratio of low frequency (LF)/HF power.

    Conclusions:
    Short-term wearing of particulate-filtering respirators may produce cardiovascular benefits by improving autonomic nervous function and reducing BP.

About

Avatar for dan @dan started