-
Nothing's true. But it makes a fair point, that you can't belive anything you read and need to sieve the fake news from the real.
I try to read 'news and opinion' from a multitude of sources, from different countries, to try to get a full sense. Even then, places that should be factual are still biased.
skinny-
Not all places that should be factual are biased - I'd argue that as the BBC manage to piss off both sides they're probably right and news agencies rely on being seen as factual and trustworthy - we'd lose clients if we weren't.
It's very good to read news from a multitude of sources but bear in mind that the article you linked to was submitted by a reader, so is effectively user generated content. I.e. the internet equivalent of Barry speaking his branes down the pub.
Fox
It must be true because it's in a non-profit newspaper run by VOLUNTEERS!
Conveniently doesn't mention that news outlets known for being unbiased are also reporting that Corbyn is a big fat loser.
Also talking about policy based voting decisions is missing the point when a lot of people agree with his policies but don't want to vote an utter shambles of a party into government.