-
• #2852
-
• #2853
Thermarest are great, but not the smallest when packed, I just need a bit of insulation and softness, not camping in the coldest months anyway..
-
• #2854
I have an old Thermarest 3/4 kicking around. I used it for 4 months of touring and it's sat around ever since.
-
• #2855
Not the smallest but pretty damn small and a lot warmer, more comfortable than the ultralight Klymit stuff. I never did get one though, I just slept in hotels or on the ground. If I was touring I'd get (another) one.
-
• #2857
I've got a thermarest venture. About 500g, cost about 50 quid but it's so comfy I use it as a spare mattress at home. Packs pretty small. Seems to be quite robust too. The further up the lightness scale you go, the more fragile they look.
-
• #2859
Looks ridiculous, frame bag and hydration bladder makes so much more sense.
-
• #2860
There are advantages/disadvantages to both.
-
• #2861
This is useful though. Utilising the unused space in the bottom of your front triangle to take some tools out of your bags
-
• #2862
That's why I sent to giofox since he was asking about filling that bottom triangle space.
There's advantages to the multi-bottle system too.
-
• #2863
Ah yeah I see now. I think it's a good solution personally. It's good to have options
-
• #2864
I think it's not optimized, if you just need to carry a spare tube down there you can just tape it, or even better wrap it around and tie it. I want the whole tool bag down there, with side access.
The long brackets are useful to move around the bottle cages, but not cheap.
The double bottle mount is bogus, unless you have chopstick thin legs, I don't see how that won't get in the way when people struggle with the width of frame bags alone. I'd use longer screws, mount the single cage on it, and use the side holes for fitting other things (some tools perhaps) -
• #2865
People struggle with frame bags because of thighs/knees.
I think depending on the position of the cages, the side bottles might end up in front of your shins and not cause interference. Possibly not though -
• #2866
I think I hit my single cages with my shoe at least once, let alone double with that arrangement.
There are plenty more better solutions to fit extra bottles on a bike
-
• #2867
Tape is sticky, normally single-use, disposable and not swappeable between bikes. Once you use a spare tube what do you do with the flat one? Ditch it? No thanks. Tying it down is better but still a bit of a faff and doesn't cover as much of the tube, this option is more protected.
Cost? Meh :) Anything related to bikes is £free :)
The double cage is just another option. I know some people who have already used their own version of that kind of double cage so there's definitely a small market for it. -
• #2868
FTFY: There are plenty of solutions to fit extra bottles on a bike and this is another.
-
• #2869
I wouldn't use tape either, I grew up using old tubes as bungees, so I'd have a piece of an old one cut and use it to tie a spare one to the bike. Very swappable between bike, non sticky, no need of bolts/holes, cheap and can make many from one single old tube. ;)
Edit: I obviously wouldn't ditch the old tube, that's just more bungees!
-
• #2870
Or another tube to patch and use again, if it's a long ride with lack of bike shops.
-
• #2871
Yeah sure, I only ditch a tube if it has 6/7 patches or holes to big. But not the point here.
I think I will just use a top tube bag for tools, and place it against the saddle
-
• #2872
Like the Revelate Jerrycan?
-
• #2873
Indeed, or the cheapest iteration of that design
-
• #2874
I like Revelate, it's spendy but nice stuff. Maybe I should've got Restrap to use some red highlights so all my bags match again? ;)
-
• #2875
Bikepacking fashion >>>>>>>
Compared to what I thought airbeds cost!