You are reading a single comment by @Howard and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
It serves the same sort of 'them and us rhetoric' which serves anyone going for a populist vote, which is what I suspect most parties will be looking for.
Yeah. Initially I thought why would he want to alienate those on that kind of money, but then perhaps he was trying appeal to people who don't earn that.
Is not the point here that the term 'rich' is, as said above, very much a moving feast depending on who you ask? Therefore it has the potential to resonate with the 90%+ of the population who don't earn anywhere near that amount. It serves the same sort of 'them and us rhetoric' which serves anyone going for a populist vote, which is what I suspect most parties will be looking for.