• http://www.cyclinguk.org/blog/duncandollimore/mason-verdict

    In their evidence, six of the witnesses made reference either to Ms
    Purcell continuing after the collision, an initial impression that
    this was a hit and run, or that she was not intending to stop. She did
    stop, but you might think that her reaction to the event would be
    something to consider when examining her awareness of her
    surroundings, and whether or not she had been or was distracted.

    One of the four witnesses the police considered irrelevant gave
    evidence that Ms Purcell’s car continued up Regent Street, that he ran
    up the street after the car which was stopped at the lights, and
    “stood in front of the car and held out my hand and asked the driver
    to stop and pull over – I indicated which way to turn the wheel to
    help her park the car”.

    He said that his first impression had been that she was leaving the
    scene, which was why he subsequently took a photograph of the number
    plate. Remember, the police didn’t think he was a relevant witness.

    Other witnesses referred variously to the car moving on, thinking
    initially it may have been a hit and run, and the car pulling up at or
    through the lights, suggesting a somewhat delayed reaction to the
    thing which she heard but did not see, but which caused a dent in her
    car bonnet.

  • Genuinely got a cold sweat on after reading that and clicking through to read other absurd things.
    System needs some big changes.

About

Avatar for mdle @mdle started