You are reading a single comment by @Velocio and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • I'm leaning towards the Sonnar but could afford any.

    Then I would get the Planar. Normally it wouldn't bother me the slightly wider aperture (especially when you are paying a bit more for it) , but the Sonar seems a bit flat compared to the Planar. For me, the weight would be less of an issue than having that nagging feeling that the other lens would take better pictures.

  • I would totally without a doubt go for the 35mm 1.4. It's a brilliant lens. I love that focal length, not sure what kind of photography you're into, but i do street, documentary and portrait. I like using 35mm and 85mm they cover all the focal lengths i need.

    But there is a way to get two lenses. Sigma's 35mm 1.4 ART Sony version. Along with the Canon and Nikon versions It has attained legendary status by now i think, I've had a go with it and it's an incredible lens, it beats or matches any other lens at that focal length. Crucially you can pick it up new under a grand and second hand for about 600/ 700. That would free you up to get a second lens maybe?

    https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sigma-35mm-f1-4-dg-hsm/5

    https://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Sigma/Sigma-35mm-F14-DG-HSM-A-Sony

    I just got a Sony A7 II, i wish, wish i could afford for the A7R II. Good luck!

About

Avatar for Velocio @Velocio started