You are reading a single comment by @plxarc and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • After an incredibly spontaneous purchase, that I'm now post rationalising as a very sensible bid to rationalise my bike collection - I've just purchased a Ritchey Commando frame..

    It's a proper fat bike with 170mm rear spacing and 135mm at the front with clearance for 26 x 3.8" tyres. However the riding I do just doesn't warrant the full fat thing, so instead I'm going to go half way and put 27.5+ wheels on with 2.8 tyres. I'm hoping that this shouldn't alter the geometry too much, but as I'm entirely new to the world of mountain bikes I probably wouldn't notice anyway.

    Planning something along the lines of this:

    or this

    Currently all I've got is frame, fork, thomson stem/post and the alpkit jones loop bar knock off.

    Planning a 1x10 groupset to keep things simple with a microshift/paul thumbie shifter.

    Wheels wise thinking wtb 27.5 i40 rims and then wtb ranger tyres 2.8, unsure on hubs

    So outstanding questions are:

    • any reasons why I can't build wider fat specific hubs, with non-fat bike rims
    • is the wider Q factor of fat bikes that noticeable?
  • I have fucked up knees and the Q factor on my fat bike has never bothered me.

    I can see any reason why you can't use fat hubs with normal rims. There are lots of people using fat friendly frames with both 29er and fat wheels.

About

Avatar for plxarc @plxarc started