Pro cycling question. Why is it that back in the day Merckx et al. appear just as proficient at winning the classics as they do a GC in a GT? Todays riders are much more specialised: TT/sprinter/climber/GC etc. Why the shift? Sports science?
Teams are less feudal now, with multiple leaders rather than a single one. The role of sports science in training and nutrition has benefited everyone in the peloton so the difference between the leaders and their domestiques is much smaller.
Pro cycling question. Why is it that back in the day Merckx et al. appear just as proficient at winning the classics as they do a GC in a GT? Todays riders are much more specialised: TT/sprinter/climber/GC etc. Why the shift? Sports science?