-
For me, the genetic argument doesn't really come into it.
What bothers me is the fairly regular sneering from certain segments in a northward direction any time independence is mentioned.
Common themes include:
violence
heroin
poor health
poor diet
weak economy
haggis
freeloading/benefit junkies
braveheart
'One-state'/'SNP'/'dear leader'any many more.
Nevermind that many of these things (insofar as they actually exist) can be fairly easily traced back to interference/governance (delete as appropriate) from Westminster...
To the people who suggest that Scotland is rife with anti-English sentiment, I don't deny it exists to some extent. Every society has its idiots. However, there is a very imporant distinction between 'anti-English', and 'anti-westminster' - the latter of which is far more prevalent and politically motivational.
-
Surprisingly enough, regional groups that correlate to post-Roman immigration are still extant.
This is based upon genetic analysis.
Perhaps more surprising, is that the same results are achieved with the analysis of surnames: eg a Lancashire Wilson will have a common heritage with most other Lancashire Wilsons.
It's only since the industrial revolution that any more than a small minority have been mobile to any appreciable degree. And, in relative terms, that is very recent.
And even then, much of the migration preserved the original groups: people largely migrated to their regional centre, rather than to centres in other regions.
Are Scots entirely anglo saxon now? As a distinct National group with its own history and traditions I'm not sure separating it along ethnic lines matters today but Scotland's composed of a distinct mix of Celts, Picts and Anglo Saxon roots.
I'd argue that a lot of the comments in this thread wouldn't be tolerated if made about Arabs, Germans or any other nationality but when it comes the the Scots, Irish and Welsh there's a surprising acceptance if not enthusiam for some quite insulting language and stereotypes from an English majority. Go figure.