Digital photography

Posted on
Page
of 857
  • Thnx man.....what a rip tho.......cook a spud......spiralise ....fry ....sell for 3£...

  • #fucktrump


    1 Attachment

    • LRM_EXPORT_20170130_224812.jpg
  • .


    1 Attachment

    • DSC_5902.jpg
  • The light last night was unreal.


    4 Attachments

    • LRM_EXPORT_20170130_230931.jpg
    • LRM_EXPORT_20170130_230930.jpg
    • LRM_EXPORT_20170130_230929.jpg
    • LRM_EXPORT_20170130_230928.jpg
  • .


    1 Attachment

    • DSC_5739 (1).jpg
  • Snaps from a long weekend in Edinburgh.

  • Lovely light / colours!
    Is this in-camera JPG settings, or PP ?

  • classic chrome jpg ^


    1 Attachment

    • light pools.jpg
  • classic chrome jpg

    Still amazes me what jpgs these cameras push out..
    ..not too keen on the MODERN, DIGITAL look of the lenses to be honest but those colours are quite something..

  • @WillMelling,,,,,,,love Kant u Kunt...

  • It's all done with photoschopenhauer.

  • @WillMelling.......Very droll...

  • Ready Brek


    1 Attachment

    • LRM_EXPORT_20170201_101523.jpg
  • What's it you don't like about the lens? The X100 gets quite dreamy if you open it up, which the ND filter allows you to do in daylight... genuinely curious.

  • To me it just often looks "too clean", a bit sterile if you will.
    This is of course not unique to the X100 series, but the same with most of the modern, flawless lenses we have today. Great performers, but lacking character sometimes I feel.
    I often cosidered getting one of the X100 cameras, the main thing putting me off is that the lens is too perfect, so to say..

  • It's pretty damn far from perfect.

    Soft wide open, soft close up, vignettes badly at all apertures, flares to the point of washing out the image completely if the sun is even 90 degrees to you...

    I suppose at 5.6 at normal distances, with the sun behind you, it's almost perfect.

  • It's pretty damn far from perfect.

    This.

    I've seen technically awesome results from the fast 35 and 56mm fuji x-mount lenses. But it doesn't amount to much if skin and highlights look (to me) either smeared, blown out, blue/cold, or a combo of the above.

  • These are noice.

  • Aye but those are more artefacts from the sensor.

    Would love an x100 with that 56mm 1.2...

  • Yeh.

    Would love an x100 with that 56mm 1.2...

    You'd have to use a lens cap as a shutter :-P

  • The sensor artifacts aren't a problem in the X-Pro2, and so presumably won't be in the X100F. TBH I quite like the fact the X100 lens gets soft under certain circumstances, but YMMV.

  • Its just a light proof box.....is what you point it at that's important.....
    I will be upgrading from the 100t to the F in 2 Months time so a heads up any one want a
    immaculate T prob no more than 3000 accu.


    1 Attachment

    • onward.jpg
  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Digital photography

Posted by Avatar for deleted @deleted

Actions