It is a little more complex than that though as we don't really have image rights over here so there is a possibility it would be legal. If it was made clear that the item wasn't endorsed by the Coppi estate then that may be sufficient. IANAL though.
Thank you for the link.
I don't know why I thought I would find the answer to my specific copyright question here but I honestly may have. - There are other case summaries shown -
There was a Rihanna v Topshop case last year covering this. In short, Rihanna won as they didn't have her permission to sell the product. More details here http://www.5rb.com/case/1-robyn-rihanna-fenty-2-roraj-trade-llc-3-combermere-entertainment-properties-llc-v-1-arcadia-group-brands-ltd-ta-topshop-2-top-shoptop-man-ltd/
It is a little more complex than that though as we don't really have image rights over here so there is a possibility it would be legal. If it was made clear that the item wasn't endorsed by the Coppi estate then that may be sufficient. IANAL though.