It's a great distraction from morally wrong TUE use and that the UCI still hasn't tightened up their TUE rules further.
It may, or may not, be morally wrong, but it's not against the rules of the sport so there is no wrongdoing.
TUE rules have been tightened, previously the UCI's chief medical officer had sole approval of them, but now a panel of three doctors needs to approve any TUE. This is how it's laid out in the WADA code and the UCI, as an Olympic sport governing body, have to comply with that.
It may, or may not, be morally wrong, but it's not against the rules of the sport so there is no wrongdoing.
TUE rules have been tightened, previously the UCI's chief medical officer had sole approval of them, but now a panel of three doctors needs to approve any TUE. This is how it's laid out in the WADA code and the UCI, as an Olympic sport governing body, have to comply with that.