-
Yeah I'm kinda hoping people more knowledgeable will discuss this sort of thing. I'm biased against the Telegraph but also know so little about economics that I have no idea. It reads as an attempt to give weight to the many 'popular' voices that say "look it's not nearly as terrible as you said it would be, haha egg on your face, it's totally fine" (be it brexit or trump or privatisation or climate change) which automatically gets my back up because I'm naturally risk averse and think a little caution isn't all bad. So back to bias.
It still is shit though, right?
hoefla-
"look it's not nearly as terrible as you said it would be, haha egg on your face, it's totally fine"
This is exactly what it is. More than this probably - it's probably closer to saying "look it's not nearly as terrible as you said it would be, haha egg on your face, now we can ignore everything you say 'cos you're always wrong kthxbai"
-
It still is shit though, right?
Yeah.
christianSpaceman
^Thats bollocks, all the predictions were based on Cameron immediately issuing A50 which he swerved and dumped on his replacement. The bizarre lack of Brexit effects might be because we've not yet brexited. The Telegraph is totally committed to the leave side and this type of disingenuous horseshit is typical.