-
• #15053
Anti
-
• #15054
its a weightweenie thing
-
• #15055
... don't want to
-
• #15056
sadly I dont't have any more, only this one
-
• #15057
-
• #15058
That clearance tho....
It's lovely. What bars are you using?
-
• #15059
-
• #15060
ahha.. dat clearance.
if you hit a pothole, what will happen ? doesn't the tire deform itself on impact, especially big fat rubber ones that don,t take a lot of pressure ? what's up with this, makes me want to cry..... :'-(
-
• #15061
How many teeth on that chainring
-
• #15062
not worrying just wondering
thanks -
• #15063
Repost from 4yr ago... just noticing now that this thing has a Rohloff
1 Attachment
-
• #15064
Hi-Pro?
1 Attachment
-
• #15065
wtf?! whats the story?
-
• #15067
bargain...
history:
_Only five ever made!
_Designed as a "hill-climbing"-bike
_80´s imagination of professional cycling-future
_One of the most unique bikes in professional bike development
_ A collectors need!
_ 28" front wheel / 24" rear wheel
interesting. anybody who can explain the supposed mechanics and the possible bullshit behind reasoning for a hi-pro climber?
-
• #15068
I mean your got constant up hill, and that only gets worse when u use it for hill climbing.
-
• #15069
Less rotating weight I'd imagine
-
• #15070
made to be followed by a stayer
-
• #15071
Lighter wheel, smaller gears=weight saved
-
• #15072
Another crazy hill climber!
-
• #15073
Another crazy hill climber!
With those ratios?
-
• #15074
i guy in sweden owned it, dont know about the gearing but frame is designed for uphill riding he told!
-
• #15075
Smaller wheel so effective lower ratio no?
Oh yeah, picture was taken before pedal Change cheers