• If it can be shown that this was assault with a motor vehicle (and I have no idea if this is realistically achievable from CCTV footage), it's much more likely to be followed up.

    There are no cameras directed at the spot where the accident occurred to the best of our knowledge. None could be seen, multiple people have looked.

    On the intentional nature... it felt that way, was so unbelievable that it could be anything else, but as of today I am wondering if it could be something else. i.e. drink driving. Drink driving would certainly be indistinguishable from intent from my perspective, it would still be a car, on a straight road, colliding with me when we're going in a straight line and have space.

    Regardless of cause, and I even considered SMIDSY though I don't believe that either... the driver must have heard the impact, and fled the scene.

    Whatever the argument is for how it happened, the driver still fled.

  • Regardless of cause, and I even considered SMIDSY though I don't believe that either... the driver must have heard the impact, and fled the scene.

    As you suggest this may still have been SMIDSY due to drink/phone or other distractions. S/h may not have seen you before they hit you

    I am sure that youre right about the fact that he hear and or saw you down after.

About

Avatar for skydancer @skydancer started