You are reading a single comment by and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Given that:

    He voted in favour of leaving the European Economic Community in 1975.

    He voted against the Maastricht Treaty that created the EU. Here's what he had to say about that — "It takes us in the opposite direction of an unelected legislative body—the Commission—and, in the case of foreign policy, a policy Commission that will be, in effect, imposing foreign policy on nation states that have fought for their own democratic accountability."

    He voted against the Lisbon Treaty which is the current constitutional basis for the EU.

    In an article on his website (mysteriously later deleted), he wrote that the EU was responsible for the gross abuse of human rights in Western Sahara.

    In another later deleted article, he wrote: "The project has always been to create a huge free-market Europe, with ever-limiting powers for national parliaments and an increasingly powerful common foreign and security policy."

    Why would I not be serious? Do adults ignore facts like these?

  • Has he ever clarified his position in a way which both engages with and builds on these points? Maybe while making his position on leaving (I.e., remaining) the EU explicit?

About

Avatar for   started