-
• #98701
-
• #98702
Clean.
-
• #98703
lols
-
• #98705
Someone teach me how to take photos like this kthanks
-
• #98706
I'll photograph a bike for you for a beer
-
• #98707
try to get more experience with bikes as well , looking at your comments page it's pretty poor given the expertise you assume
-
• #98708
Who, me?
-
• #98710
also page!
-
• #98711
Sorry for having a life and not posting on the internet more.
What exactly is my crime? I've enough experience though thank you. Your opinion of me is wholly invalid as it is for your criticism of other people's subjective versions of bike porn.
So you can go back to posting shit, boring bikes that you spaff over because they're old, whilst I'll be making the first ever addition to my ignore list since I've been on this forum. -
• #98712
Apologies everyone
-
• #98713
I will genuinely take you up on that offer (in the new year likely). My Orlo is now finished and I wanted to get some nice photos taken of it. You still SW based?
-
• #98714
Yep, Putney. Sounds good mate
Keep an eye out for a good location until then! -
• #98715
1 Attachment
-
• #98716
jog on
-
• #98717
Smaller rear triangle stiffer? Or just because reasons?
-
• #98718
das
-
• #98719
your clearly know you're shit
-
• #98720
-
• #98721
My educated guess would be that they did it for the same reason as on @Breso hour record moser. When you have a narrower BB, you can mount the BB lower (without the risk of pedalstrike) which gives you an aero advantage, I guess. Since the bb spindle is considerably narrower, the chainstays need to be moved up to provide enough clearance for the chainring.
-
• #98722
-
• #98723
That makes a lot of sense, thanks! The chain stay only just passes by the chainring so looks like that would be the case.
-
• #98724
impressive grammar skills in that last post
-
• #98725