I doubt that they'll be able to make this one stick, but it will be interesting to see if it ever gets to court. I can't for the life of me imagine that a half-built (or, perhaps, by then, fully-built) tower will be taken down again. I personally would be in favour of that, but the battle for this one was lost under the two previous administrations.
The sound of stable doors being shut after the horse has bolted here:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/nov/23/london-mayor-urged-to-act-over-tower-that-compromises-st-pauls-view
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/nov/25/st-pauls-not-consulted-over-development-that-mars-view-of-cathedral
I doubt that they'll be able to make this one stick, but it will be interesting to see if it ever gets to court. I can't for the life of me imagine that a half-built (or, perhaps, by then, fully-built) tower will be taken down again. I personally would be in favour of that, but the battle for this one was lost under the two previous administrations.